Fear and loathing in the Media..

It always has been apparent during this campaign that the media has despised and feared Donald trump since emerged as the nominee of the Republican party back in June. They have been unabashed partisans and have considered it their mission to take him down, objectivity and journalistic credentials be damned.

But it is now becoming evident -- to them -- that he has a very good chance of winning. He is leading in a number of swing states, is close in others, and his surge over the last month had been a formidable and irreversible tide rising across the land.

Basically, they are triggered, quaking in their boots, hunkered down in their safe spaces, sucking on their thumbs, clutching their teddy bears, with their "binkies" pressed firmly aside their heads.

The hooligan horde of Visigoths -- We, the Deplorables -- are at the gates, pitchforks and torches in hand, effigies of Hillary Clintoon either aflame or strung up on miniature scaffolds. We scream for her blood, for their blood, for revenge for the years of their arrogance and tyranny and elitism.

One can easily conjure images of the "national barber" to be set up in the town square, a latter-day Robespierre and Madame Dafarge at the head of the phalanxes of a bloodthirsty citizenry, and a new Reign of Terror to eventuate.

Well, good! Any terror that creeps in and chills their stony little hearts is more than welcome! They have confounded us for years, no, decades, with their pontificating and pronouncements, their coronations and ordinations of their heroes and their haughty decrees of how things will be. All the while, we toil in our pathetic, work-a-day struggles to eke out our daily crust.

But now they are in full flight and their horror is evident. Consider:

In a move reminiscent of remarks made by Jefferson Davis after Lee surrendered at Appomattox (wherein he said this would free the remaining Confederate forces to fight without the strictures of territory), the NYT has recanted and decreed that Ohio is no longer a battleground state of significance.

This is especially convenient since Clinton has essentially ceded this state to Trump and he has been leading in polls there since the beginning of September when she hacked her way through a labor day speech appearance int he state and a follow-up discussion on her "Dump One" campaign aircraft.

Also, after the first debate when all of the Hacks for Hillary were lying abed, smoking a post-coital stogie over her perceived victory - the ability to remain vertical and cough free for 90 minutes while hurling petulant zingers at Trump and glowering smugly - the afterglow dissipated rapidly with the appearance of a torrential wave of pro-Trump snap poll results.

Basically Hillbag, it seems, had won the skirmish but was losing the war. We, the great unwashed masses with all our inherent computer techno-whiz hacker genius had conspired to rig these overnighters with a ton of upvotes for DJT countering an unenthusiastic paucity of hits rippling for the Hillster.

Oh my! What to do?

No problem! Just disavow those little device you put on your website as clickbait like Buzzfeed did:

Dunno why these dull, plodding, unagile cretins could not have seen this. I mean, if you go out to ANY YouTube video that deals with Trump, Hillary, or the election and look at the thread of comments you will see pro-Trump remarks that are variously lively, enthusiastic, obnoxious, and supportive of The Donald. They are similarly vicious and merciless in savaging the dullards who post their pathetic anti-Trump or pro-diseased lying cow bleatings. The same holds true even for such establishment sites as the WaPo, WSJ, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc. where one finds fusillades of invective. Why did these geniuses believe this enthusiasm would NOT translate into keyclick support on their stupid-assed polls?

So now, with the horror penetrating all the way to their very marrow, they have come up with possibly the last "civilized" weapon in their arsenal: the "historic" editorial endorsement.

The Arizona Republic has, for the first time in its history, chosen a Democrat over a Republican to endorse. (I am not going to provide a link. If you want to give them the traffic, then Google it yourself.) Their editorial just flat overlooks the steaming mountain of corruption and graft and nefarious activities that this woman has raked up during her stretch in the public arena all because they hate The Donald. Of course, the comments are loaded up with sycophantic responses (no doubt from campaign plants and trolls) disgorging such effluvia as the fact that the Dallas Morning News and Cincinnati Enquirer have done the same.

"Well, Jimmy, if all of the kids in your class jumped off the cliff, would you have jumped off as well?"

But here's the kicker: according to Jim Hoft over at The Gateway Pundit, the paper is putting those calling into the paper to cancel their subscriptions on hold for up to 45 minutes:

Waiting on the phone for 45 minutes for anything is monumentally stupid. Just send registered letter informing them of your intent to cancel the subscription. Also insist on a return receipt signed by the circulation manager. About 1,000 such letters would straighten these fools out.

The pièce de résistance, however, seems to belong to USA Today -- that fishwrap conveniently available at each checkout counter of your local supermarket. In that paper's endorsement of Clinton and denigration of Donald Trump, the language is so over the top that you can almost see the white knuckles on the hands typing this:

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.

Whether through indifference or ignorance, Trump has betrayed fundamental commitments made by all presidents since the end of World War II. These commitments include unwavering support for NATO allies, steadfast opposition to Russian aggression, and the absolute certainty that the United States will make good on its debts. He has expressed troubling admiration for authoritarian leaders and scant regard for constitutional protections.

Jesus! Take a deep breath, pal!

Are these guys clueless or what? Not knowing where to begin a rebuttal, again I'll leave Googling the link to you.

But it seems that the final word in knee-buckling goes that august assemblage of parking-ticket accumulators-on-the-Hudson, the United Nations:

..it was only a tweet and, true to form, these gutless wimps withdrew it an hour or so later. But still in all..

The instances above only scratch the surface. There were, are, and will be much more of this crap because the creators live in stark terror of the following:

Donald J. Trump is winning, he will be the champion of ALL AMERICANS and these clowns' time in power and at the reins is ticking down to zero.

Sand Nigger Hunting Season Opens Up Soon!

What with the debates and all that other shit going on, I musta short-circuited. They most wonderful time of year is upon us. Be sure to head down to your local Cabela's, Dick's, or Turner's and get your license and latest in hunting gear for the upcoming season:

Aloha Snackbar, motherfucker!

Zero Point Zero

Posted in response to a comment someone made on Bruins Nation regarding UCKLA's 9-consecutiver loss to Stanford in football and Coach Jim Mora's graded effort:

So, who'll win the first debate?

Joel Pollack maintains that Pussy Deplore will.

His article intones:

Trump fans, brace yourselves: Hillary Clinton will win the first presidential debate. She will not do enough to put away the Republican nominee, but she will stop his momentum and force him to work that much harder to win.

There are several reasons Clinton will win. Ironically, one of them is her fragile health.

Winning debates is all about beating expectations. And expectations for Trump are very low. Until recently, it seemed that all he would have to do to win is avoid major gaffes, and keep his cool.

But now, expectations for Clinton are even lower. Her collapse on September 11 has led to wild speculation that she might not be able to make it through 90 minutes. If she merely stays upright, she beats expectations.

(The Commission on Presidential Debates confirmed to Breitbart News Thursday that the candidates will be standing for the first debate. If they were seated, Clinton would have more energy but lose the strategic benefit of diminished expectations.)

Even without low expectations, Clinton should win the first debate, for two reasons.

The first is that she is the most seasoned debater in American political life today. Clinton does not have any real achievements to boast after eight years as First Lady, another eight years in the Senate, four years as Secretary of State, and two presidential campaigns. But years of debating — and years of evading questions — have helped her develop a polished, if uninspiring, public persona that conveys competence.

Clinton has two main debating tricks. One is to deploy distracting but serious-sounding details whenever she is faced with a question she does not want to answer. The other is to laugh at uncomfortable moments. Her laugh — a “cackle,” to her critics — is awkward but disarming, humanizing.
....
It is telling that while Trump successfully used the Republican primary debates to pick off his opponents one-by-one with a series of well-crafted “kill shots” — “low-energy” Jeb Bush, “little” Marco Rubio, “lyin'” Ted Cruz, Carly “look at that face” Fiorina — he won very few of the debates, online polls notwithstanding. If the moderator, NBC’s Lester Holt, decides to play “fact-checker” against Trump — something Trump is clearly concerned about — Trump is probably going to suffer most.

But there is one larger reason that Clinton will win the first debate: the media will tell everyone she has won, regardless.

They are openly hostile to Trump, they know Clinton needs help, and they want to make up for Matt Lauer and Jimmy Fallon, who committed the grave sin of being fair to both.

With legions of faux fact-checkers, and battalions of biased pundits, the fix is in. Clinton will enjoy a bump in the polls– and Trump will have to claw his way back in the weeks and debates that follow.

To which I respond:

I submit that you are both correct and wrong at the same time. You are correct in that Hillary will "win" the first debate. But you are wrong in that the press and her relieved followers may by jubilant because she did not wheeze, hack, take a 30-minute pee break or do the funky chicken and fall to the floor frothing at the mouth -- and therefore call her the victor.

But while the debate will be called "hers" by acclaim of the adoring press, it will not diminish the fervor of Trump followers and probably do LITTLE to add to her ratings. (Famous last words on my part, to be sure, but I do NOT believe that Trump "will have to claw his way back" as Pollack states. Her style, wonkishness, and grating voice will do more to turn off voters than win them over. The media had Carter the winner of his debate with Reagan in 1980, but the viewing public would have none of it.

Then, again, Trump may have a Gipperesque "Well, there you go again.." moment and put the old cow away.

..and this presupposes that NO Assange Wikileaks releases will see the light of day, contrary to what he promised.

Ruh Roh!

Look out..here come de judge!

Straight Line

In one of the BEST STRAIGHT LINES ever handed out, the Dem's beloved Pussy Deplore walked into rotating fan blades with this tweet:

Of course, pounced upon by a sharp cementer over at Hot Gas.

Bud Abbott could not have done better.

Cluster Fuck

Money quotes (emphasis added):

On Wednesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Clinton Campaign Manager Robby Mook dodged questions about Clinton’s Syria policy, which prompted members of the panel to say, “we may be tiptoeing into Gary Johnson territory here,” and ask, “you can’t lay out your plan, how can you convince voters that Hillary Clinton is the better choice, Robby?” And “why do we have you here?”

Mook was asked by co-host Willie Geist, “Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State when this crisis began. What’s her biggest regret about the way Syria’s been handled?”

He answered, “Well, I — obviously she’s been out of office for some time now. … I think she’s well regarded for her leadership as Secretary of State. She came out of that office with a 70% approval rating. She, in contrast to Donald Trump has released a clear and decisive plan to defeat ISIS. Donald Trump has said that he thinks he knows more about it than the generals and refuses to tell us what his secret plan is.”

Geist responded, “I understand, Robby. What about in Syria, though? She supported the drawing of the red line. Obviously, she was out of her office when Assad used chemical weapons. Was it a mistake to draw the red line if the president was not willing to go — to do something about it when it was crossed?”

Mook stated, “Well, as you pointed out, the decision regarding that was made after she was out of office so, I think you’d have to ask President Obama.”

followed up, “Was she disappointed that the president didn’t act when the line was crossed?”

Mook said, “I think you’d have to ask her about that question, how she would characterize it.”

Geist then asked, “Well, you’re here to speak for her, Robby. So, you haven’t discussed that all?”

Mook responded, “She — look, I — what matters is what she is going to do as president. And as I said, she has a clear plan to defeat ISIS. Donald Trump does not. It’s a secret. He won’t tell anybody what it is and he says he knows more than the generals. I think the choice for voters is clear.”

Mook was then asked by Geist, “So, day one in office then, Robby, what does she do in regards to Syria?”

He stated, “Well, first of all, she needs to — she has said that she will work with our allies to dismantle their safe harbor in Syria and Iraq. She will harden our defenses here at home, and she will dismantle their network around the world, and a lot of that’s going to happen in the — in cyberspace, and through digital communications. So, you can go on our website and read the full plan there.”

Columnist Mike Barnicle then asked, “So, Robby, we do realize that you are not secretary of state, but in the debate, next Monday evening, how would Secretary Clinton respond to somewhat of a version of the following question: We’ve had a relief convoy bombed, potentially a war crime, leading into Aleppo. What would you do, Secretary Clinton, about providing food, water, and medicine to the citizens of eastern Aleppo today, right now, differently than what the Obama administration is doing? What would she do differently?”

Mook responded, “I — again, I think you’re going to have to ask her that question. That’s a matter of policy. I’m going to leave it for her to determine that.”

..yet the lying, diseased bag of pig afterbirth is abed with pneumonia or the flu or walking pellagra or some such malady and, when vertical, waves off basic questions about such banalities as crashing poll numbers, etc.

What an aptly named campaign manager this guy is and what a clusterfuck this campaign is.

"Sweet" Lou Dobbs

..having tired of the drivel at FNS and other outlets, I have taken to watching Lou Dobbs *exclusively* in the evenings and skulking around the internet as daily activities permit. I know Lou Dobbs as a source is not exactly old news but I wearied of "spirited, bi-partisan debate" and the other platitudes used to describe the presence of some unhinged, screaming/giggling, sardonic lib moron advocate spewing his or her bile all over the living room floor in front of my 60" Samsung.

To the point: Ed Rollins has been an interesting bellwether recently. At first cynical and uncomplimentary when DJT was running his mouth and stepping all over his dick (so to speak), Rollins can barely suppress a demonic grin here and there as he lauds Trump's performance these days. He REALLY, REALLY loves The Donald and what his campaign is doing.

Also, the incessant gushing -- while clearly the sound track for our DJT echo chamber -- by Dobbs and his panels (all certified Hillary haters/Trump lovers; nary a commie in the bunch) are the perfect balm for the irritations and abrasions of the caustic, anti-Trump elitist manure extant in other outlets.

Weak and Pauline Kaelesque on my part to be sure, but if the diseased, lying, [semi-]ambulatory quivering mass of pig afterbirth that is HRC has got this rigged and WILL triumph in November, then I want to be sitting at a table on the afterdeck of the Titanic, listening to the band play "Closer My God to Thee" and sipping a very dry Beefeater's Martini as the country goes down by the bow.

Clear?

I didn't think so.

Bush League

Drink this in:

So here's the deal. I did not pay serious attention to the GOP side of the POTUS race until about January of this year. There was a fascination with the fact that Donald Trump was rolling up massive crowds even back on October, November, and December of 2015 but that was it. Then the primaries started and in New Hampshire ~~ who the hell counts people gathering in the dead of Winter at coffee klatches to discuss politics? ~~ and then somewhere around the end of February, Jeb Bush backed out. Up 'til that point, I remember a couple of things: fristly, I went to a USAF Auxiliary meeting and the speaker didn't show up so we watched a debate. Secondly, Jeb Bush burned through ONE HUNDRED MILLION BUCKS before he bailed.

Somewhere between February 20th and now, I put these two events together. Let me explain.

The debate I watched was the one where Trump bailed because he said they were a waste of time and the remaining candidates battled each other. It was my distinct impression that ALL OF THESE FOLKS were just like Mutt Rumbley back in 2012 and John McStain back in 2008. They were boring, said the same old shit, and all looked like they had NOTHING up their sleeves that would prevent them from getting steamrolled by the then anointed Democrat Queen on her coronation march. I suddenly grokked to why the GOPe was a steaming pile of shit and, no matter what the fuck we did, these folks were just trolling us to get their political power and get back to D.C. where they could play their games and bend over Americans.  It was at that point that my interest peaked in Trump and the crowds he was attracting.

As for the $100 million, I understood it -- sort of -- but still thought it was a lot of money.

I'll come to the point.

Today there were a couple of items about the Bush family and supporters that caused me to go back and do a little research on Jeb's campaign skills or lack of same (see above) and it sent me over the edge. It shows me that, for all of their money and breeding and so-called class, they would rather throw their support behind a crook, a liar, a thief, and, arguably, a murderer -- about the closest thing you can get to a Mafia crime boss -- for president than the nominee of their party and a genuine champion of the working class American. Moreover, it seems that some of their rich friends do as well. So they are joining the slime that is Mutt Rumbley and the others in kicking the teeth of those millions of Americans who supported their kin in 1988 and 1992 and 2000 and 2004.

I worked very hard for "W" in 2000 and 2004; walked precincts, did mailers, worked the phones -- and even contributed money. And this is the tanks I get. The whole lot of them (except for Jeb's son, George P. Bush) can die in a fire for all I care. Except for Bush 41: I hope he does one of those birthday parachute thingies and the rip cord breaks.

(I am somewhat curious about "W" but do not hold out hope.)

So them and Rumbley and all of the other rich bastards who sucked on us to gain/attempt to gan=in political power are nothing but grimy ward-heelers and card carrying members of the Uniparty in D.C.

Fuck. Them. All.

Oh yeah, and I finally dug up a video that explained how Jeb Bush blew through the huge wad of cash put up for his campaign:

This guy is a monumental shit stain.

Bring it on..

Culled from a thread somewhere on the interwebs:

My response:

Good! Then we will keep bombing you,imprisoning you, vilifying you, usurping your lands BECAUSE WE HATE YOU AND WILL NOT STOP FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER UNTIL ALL OF YOU FUCKING VERMIN ARE WIPED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH!

..there, are you happy now?

Throwing in the rag..

No words; just drink this in. Any moment now Lord Cornwallis's aide de camp will be showing up with his commander's sword.

..a-dope a-dope a-dope-dope dope dope..

Monumental stupidity by the diseased bitch:

..but here's the money shot:

“They didn’t care. Their attitude, then, back in July, during the DNC, was they were going to win this thing anyway, so who cares? Now, I think the tides have turned a little bit and she’s on her heels. As many times as we’ve tried to…have it a fair process and an open process, the emails back were that they’re not interested and no thanks. Just snide things like that.”

He stated his local chapter will heed the recommendation for Trump, who he met with personally in New York.

“We’re falling in line with the national FOP and, basically, she just disregarded and blew the police off. You can’t go in and expect to get respect when you didn’t give it to us. We gave a very fair process, we thought. We put out a questionnaire and she absolutely refused…outright refused, with a nasty campaign rebuttal to why she wouldn’t. Simple as that, we went in and we participated with the candidate that cooperated. He filled it out. We met with him.”

Oh, man, you cannot get any dumber than that! It's the city where she held her convention, fer crissakes!

Boy, is Lou Dobbs gonna be fun tonight!

Rope-a-dope..

So there's this deal: some time ago the "Birther" issue surfaced. This was the conjecture over The Lawn Jockey POTUS's place of birth and whether he was an American citizen (and eligible to be POTUS) or not. Lost in the mists of time and riddled by accusation and counter accusation is who started it, Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump.

Frankly, I do not give a crap!

I do know that Trump was prominent in that conjecture, forcing Obama to eventually produce his birth certificate. I also know that Clinton used that issue in her failed run for the nomination versus Obama in 2008. I also know that, given the increased desperation of Clinton in the wake of her slowly disintegrating campaign this year, she is pulling out all the stops and throwing everything against the wall to see what will stick. And this birther issue seems to be one of those chunks of goo that Frau Colostomy Bag is hefting at the moment.

So Trump seizes on the opportunity today and says he's going to make a big announcement on the subject. Immediately, Hillary took the bait. America's ex-wife thought she had Trump lined up in her sights so she came out and made the acerbic video below anticipating that Trump was going to re-open the issue.

And then here's Trumps big announcement:

That's right! At the end, he says that Obama's a citizen and the matter is closed!

So it's a 30-minute commercial spot of him being endorsed by 17 Medal of Honor winners at a the opening of one of his new hotels and it ends up that Trump (1) suckered Hillary into giving that horribly negative and disgraceful talk and appearing to be the clueless bitch she really is, (2) got 30 minutes of FREE air time out of CNN (as conceded by by John Hill of CNN), (3) got glowing endorsements from the 17 American military heroes, and (4) laid the matter to rest and relegated it to the scrap-heap should his opponents or the media bring it up again.

Clear to me that while others are playing checkers, Trump is playing chess.

Hillary's probably just playing Mumbly Peg.

UPDATE: It seems like this Birther thing is going through the last conniptions of its death throes. the two campaigns are fighting to get in the last word or, in the case of a pissing contest, the last squirt. Well, Breitbart has come up with this tidbit:

Jesus! It's a non-essential, desperate Hail-Mary issue that has little relevance and won't advance the ball for Frau Colostomy Bag. Even if she did/does succeed on pinning the responsibility for the birther meme on The Donald, who the fuck cares?

I gotta tell ya, if Hillary had a dick (which she probably does; at least an enraged clitoris), she'd be stepping all over it.

She should switch to the Republican party; they do that sorta shit all the time.

[Back] On the Road Again..

Worth the wait? You tell me as Hillary seemingly picks up where she left off before doing the Funky Chicken and being the object of a Sunday morning Bag Toss into her Scooby Van at Ground Zero on Sunday, 9-11-2016.

Her sidekick, Kaine, did not exactly pack 'em in either up in Cow Hampshire. He beat HRC's crowd but only by abbout 60 soulds He had a protester jump his bones after he gave his speech but, other than that, it was pretty desultory:

As one cementer observed it's a pretty patnhetic showing when you consider about 40 were the press, 25 was security detail, 30 were protestors, 90 were paid shills...the balance was Kaine's or HRC's immediate family and some guys with nothin' to do.

Ms Peggy Lee said it so well..

And so did the late great Dandy DOn Meridith with his rendition of Willie Nelson's favorite:

So, the old adage must be true: Hillary sucks.

Roll Tide!

Remember to wear RED on Election Day!

Not making this shit up -- Part Deux and a Half..

A week agor or so, Frau Colostomy Bag ruminated in scripted remarks about HALF of Donald Trump's supporters being "deplorable and irredeemable" and it brought down HALF of the house. Well, it seems that her subsequent health issues and Sunday, 9/11 vapor lock has brought down another half:

I think this is really rich! And, just between us girls, if that evil cunt faceplants and starts a dirt nap tomorrow, nary a tear would roll down my whiskered and haggard cheek. I would probably inquire where they were going to plant the remains, down four bowls of the spiciest chili I can find, a bottle of habaneras, three flagons of Milk of Magnesia and migrate to that location to plant a steaming and fragrant Hershey Squirt on her grave.

..yes, I am in a shitty mood and, YES, I hate the crooked bitch that much.

But, in the future I resolve not to hold back.

You cannot make this shit up..

It seems that HRC is/will be -- I hope you're sitting down -- featured in the October issue of Women's Health magazine.

Well, I told you to sit down, didn't I?

Well,, courtesy of Breitbart, here it is -- or at least a tweet about it:

But that ain't all. It gets better:

When asked about the biggest obstacle she faced during her campaign, Clinton said it was the new media culture.

“In the heat of a campaign, in a culture that rewards brevity and clever phrases on social media, it can be really tempting to give simple answers to complex problems,” she said. “That’s never been my style.”

She asserted that she was “a little wonky” but believed in discussing specifics in her proposals.

Clinton called for women across the country to work for change in America, to make it more equal between women and men.

“As first lady, senator, and secretary of state, I would watch world leaders roll their eyes whenever I brought up issues that affect women and girls,” she said. “But with persistence – and data – I’ve watched it dawn on more than a few men that women’s issues are their issues too.”

I think I am gonna barf. Can you imagine four years with a tyrannical shrieking psycho-bitch like this. One of the bloggers on the old Hot Air used to call her "America's Ex-Wife".

Not too far from the truth, that!

UPDATE: But, as long as we're on the subject of truth, here's an asshole who has not been known to purvey much of it:

CNN is orgasming because his approval rating is somewhere around the high 50s but they don't realize it's because he's on his way out and a lot of us are happier to see his ass end than his front end. I frankly hope he dies in a fire.

Twenty-five to Life

From BB this morning:

He basically said:

You will see every president, in recent years, literally ages about 25 years. They go gray in just a matter of their first term, usually. This is a product of what? The incredible stress put upon the individual who, every day – well, except for Obama, who only read half of them – but usually every day is given an intelligence brief that would make most people never sleep again.

“The president’s daily briefing is the latest intelligence on what the bad guys are doing, whether it’s Russia, ISIS, North Korea, or what have you,” he explained, adding:

And on top of that, they have to bear on their shoulders the responsibility that there’s always somebody walking within 20 yards of them, carrying the suitcase, the “football,” that allows them to launch a nuclear strike within minutes, should it be required to defend the United States.

“That’s the level of stress. I mean, short of being a brain surgeon, or somebody like, you know, Ben Carson, who has to separate conjoined twins, there really are very few jobs comparable to being the commander-in-chief, when it comes to stress levels,” he concluded.

So, by way of extrapolation, if HRC gets elected, I kind of think she's going to end up like this poor schlumpf:

Face Plant for Hillary..

(I'm NOT with her.)

..courtesy of a poster over at Gateway Pundit.

And, as long as we're talking about "face plants". (Get it?)

No, I really did NOT mean that picture above. Although, every day, more and more, we see these absolutely HORRID pictures of this creature. It's like her pitch-black inner soul is eating away at the surface and she is becoming an almost Hollywood-like apparition, the crystallizaiton of pure Satanic evil. I meant that she and her minions are still unrepentant and resuse to walk back some of the PREPARED "deplorable/irredeemable" speech she gave while at the Friday fundraiser:

A Clinton official said that while the nominee has expressed regret over her phrasing, there are at least some Trump supporters her campaign considers to be in the "deplorables" category.

"What should she have said? Ten percent? Twenty percent? Five percent? What would have been a more accurate number?" CNN's Wolf Blitzer asked Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon on his show.

"I don't know, Wolf. It's certainly a non-zero number," Fallon responded.

Earlier Monday, Trump called Clinton's remarks "the single biggest mistake of the political season" and called on her to retract her comments or drop out of the race for the White House.
“The disdain that Hillary Clinton expressed for millions of decent Americans disqualifies her from public service,” Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, said during a speech in Baltimore.

“You cannot run for president if you have such contempt in your heart for the American voter, and she does. You can’t lead this nation if you have such a low opinion for its citizens," Trump said.

Clinton on Saturday said she was wrong to generalize that "half" of Trump's supporters fell into a "basket of deplorables," while defending her attack on certain elements of his support.

"The mistake I think, Wolf, was trying to quantify it," Fallon said Monday on CNN's "Wolf."

Fallon mentioned former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke's support of Trump's candidacy and Trump's hiring of Stephen Bannon from the far-right Breitbart News website to be his campaign's chief executive as examples of Trump lending credence to the so-called alt-right movement, a hardcore conservative sect often associated with white nationalism.

Jee-suz, talk about bitter clingers! It's like the guy in the bar asking the girl if she would screw him for a million and then $10 and when she accepts the first and rejects the second he tells her he already knows she's a whore and they're just haggling over the price.

By the way, there are whispers that the DNC is beginning to plan to prepare to contemplate the possibility of perhaps moving her aside in favor of a short closer. Also whispered is the fact that Tim Kaine is beginning to heat up (in the bull pen). Also mentioned by some of the MSM dick-suckers (I am looking at you, Cokie Roberts you phallus-ingesting NPR crack whore) wonder if Slow Joe Biden might want to take a turn at the plate. And, you all know that once the whispers start, they can turn into stiff breezes and eventually full gale force winds.

Not sure how that would work at this late date, but this ain't gonna like the NJ dropout of Toricelli owing to malfeasance or Paul Wellstone dying in a plane crash. This is the election of the POTUS and this concerns all fifty states. One has to beleive there are deadlines in place and even votes cast because of early voting that should constrain these frivolities.

Should, I said.

Death Throes [of a campaign]..

Playing in Peoria..

Unfortunately, this happens to be in North Carolina and they ain't a lot of adherents aboard the Hillary train. Shot of her struttin' her stuff at the John C. Smith University gymnasium:

..it's a small black liberal arts college in Charlotte; ideal sweet spot for attendance being a swing state and the ethnicity and so on. (Wonder if she's carrying a bottle of hot sauce in her purse?)

Again with the Socal afternoon drive radio..(a rant)

Following up on an earlier post about the desert wasteland that is SoCal AM/PM commute radio, I am feeling mean and nasty and just want to drop a steaming deuce on some of these clowns' parades.

In the morning, we are saddled with the sanctimonious, glib, and truly unlistenable while the afternoon features the bloviating genius (Mark Levin) and Mr Cheeto-Face (Glenn Beck) plus John & Ken, sensationalist pot-and-pan bangers on KFI and John Phillips and Jillian Barberie on KABC. Stir into the mix vacuous sports talks shows with their eternal rehasing of the Colon Krapper-knickers stand-up-sit-down-fight-fight-fight non-controversies (someone just shoot him and let's move on), a former all-news station converted to 24/7 Hindu music (I kid you not), and mile-wide and a mile deep of Hispanic stations pounding out Salsa, Ranchera, and Mariachi.

Some days, I get home and swear I can see bits of my brain leaking out of my ears.

While my fervent hope is that either Levin or Beck (or both) tank so badly in their ratings that they move someone like Larry Elder into do the drive slot. Tah man is fervent, impetuous, driven, and a great listen.

But, that said, this bag job is about one of the aforesaid personalities who has just flat turned me off ~~ and, believe me, I do the same to her!

Jillian "Ben Wa Balls" Barbarie (left) is an otherwise good-looking woman who co-hosts with Phillips on KABC as I mentioned. But, after you get past her looks, what she talks about and how she talks are a distinct member-wilterer. If it has anything to do with sex, she's on it like -- er -- a dog on a bone.

Incessantly!

She must be a fucking nymphomaniac!

The Real Deals

At first I thought enticing and a little racy, but then after I realized that this woman has a one track mind, it just got flat boring -- and downright unlistenable. Add to that the fact that her delivery is akin to some post-juvenile crack-whore ingenue and you get the picture: just incessant prattle about boy and girl parts and the conjoining thereof.

My wish is that someone would attach her to the business end of a steam pile driver so the earth will move and she will finally STFU.

Donald Trump on security..

According to a Breitbart post, Trump leveled a scathing blast at Clintoon on the subject of defence and the security of this nation:

Donald Trump is zeroing in on national security, foreign policy and America’s military.
During a speech in Philadelphia, the Republican blasted his rival Hillary Clinton — describing her record as “disqualifying.”

“In a Trump administration, our actions in the Middle East will be tempered by realism,” Trump stated, explaining that regime change produces radical terrorism. During his remarks at the Union League of Philadelphia he added, “we can make new friends, rebuild old alliances and bring new allies into the fold. I’m proud to have the support of war fighting generals.”

..and..

Trump blasted his rival’s record as secretary of state on foreign policy and national security, saying he will be guided by “diplomacy, not destruction.”

“She’s trigger happy and very unstable,” the New Yorker stated of Clinton, also calling her “reckless” over her use of a personal server with classified emails during her time as secretary of state.

Trump criticized Clinton’s handling of Libya, Syria, ISIS and Iran. “What have we gotten from the horrible decisions made from President Obama and Secretary Clinton?” Trump questioned.

An NBC News|SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking poll published early Wednesday showed that voters who currently serve in the military or previously served prefer Trump over Clinton by 19 points.

He released a list of proposals:

PROPOSAL: Immediately after taking office, Mr. Trump will ask the generals to present a plan within 30 days to defeat and destroy ISIS.

PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump will ask Congress to fully eliminate the defense sequester and will submit a new budget to rebuild our military as soon as he assumes office.

PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump will build an active Army of around 540,000, as the Army’s chief of staff has said he needs.

PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump will build a Marine Corps based on 36 battalions, which the Heritage Foundation notes is the minimum needed to deal with major contingencies.

PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump will build a Navy approaching 350 surface ships and submarines, as recommended by the bipartisan National Defense Panel.

PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump will build an Air Force of at least 1,200 fighter aircraft, which the Heritage Foundation has shown to be needed to execute current missions.

PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump will seek to develop a state of the art missile defense system.

PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump will modernize our nation’s naval cruisers to provide Ballistic Missile Defense capabilities.

PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump will enforce all classification rules, and enforce all laws relating to the handling of classified information.

PROPOSAL: One of Mr. Trump’s first commands after taking office will be asking the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and all relevant federal departments, to conduct a thorough review of United States cyber defenses and identify all vulnerabilities – in our power grid, our communications systems, and all vital infrastructure.

All this is in advance of an NBC News "Commander-in-Chief forum" on Wednesday at 8 p.m. where Trump and Clinton to answer questions on military affairs, veterans issues and national security.

Clintoon's response:

UPDATE: Trump Sizzles!

In a follow-up article, BB mentioned intoned that Trump hit it out of the park:

PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania — Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for president, dazzled in yet another speech in which he outperformed expectations here on Wednesday laying out a strategic vision for the United States under a Trump presidency when it comes to foreign and defense policy.

The speech, which stunned media figures, pundits, and those throughout the political class, only seemed to get better as every line went by.

Well, I sure hope he gets elected because I am sicker than puke of the last eight years of these "Kumbaya" circle-jerks as a defense policy.

I worked for an organization whose philosophy was basically this:

"You can launch a nuclear attack if you like, but be prepared to have ten times what you unleash on us shoved up your asshole before your missiles and bombs land!"

Of course, that's back when men had balls. Now they're just a bunch of pasty-faced, tutu-wearing metro-sexual ballerina dancers.

Deplaning in Ohio..

So Frau Colostomy Bag had a pair of fits whilst making appearances over Labor Day -- one at her appearance venue and the other aboard Colostomy Bag One. The former was so severe as to affect HER ENTIRE SPEECH while the latter cut off a "press gaggle" of fawning sycophantic admirers reporters on her new, used 737. (Which will, in light of comparison to Trump's "Trump One", the top-of-the-line 757 with the gold plated fixtures, appointments, and seat belt buckles, to be renamed "Dump One".)

Anyway, there are tons of points to chew on here and I wish to do so as the campaign progresses. But for the moment, here are some semi-official non-Reuters-interdicted videos of the two hacking fits:

For the moment, I will proffer this thought on Clintoon's -- er -- labored breathing: If a casual off-hand and enthusiastic scream was sufficient to torpedo a Dem campaign effort way back when, then surely demonstrably questionable health and demonstrably questionable ethics and truthfulness is certainly sufficient to disqualify an individual from the most important job in the free world.

Just spitballin' here. More to come.

Pee Diddely Shit..

So, it seems that Donald Trump has lit a fire under a number of assholes' asses with his outreach to the black community -- and it seems to have especially annoyed some of the race pimps who perceive Trump and moving in on their territory. Here's a blast From BB on the subject from two of 'em:

In an interview with Al Sharpton on Sunday, rap and fashion mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs urged the African-American community to “turn up the heat” on Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, because their issues have not been addressed under President Obama’s leadership.

“I feel like we put President Obama in the White House. When I look back, I just wanted more done for my people because that’s the name of the game,” Diddy told Sharpton on the latter’s MSNBC show PoliticsNation on Sunday.

“This is politics. You put somebody in office, you get in return the things that you care about for your communities. I think we got a little bit shortchanged,” the 46-year-old mogul continued. “That’s not knocking the president. …He’s done an excellent job, you know, but I think it’s time to turn up the heat because the black vote is going to decide who is the next president of the United States.”

That's rich. These guys -- both wealthy and black get together and beat their gums about a black president who "dint do nuffin" for their people arguably cause race relations to deteriorate int he eight years he was he HNIC.

Look, I understand where they are coming from and blacks have EVERY RIGHT to be pissed off at politicians who patronize them EVERY TWO TO FOUR YEARS, get their vote, and then go into hiding until the next elections. Shit howdy, I can't stand these butt wipe pols myself and, compared to some crack whore in the projects, I am "a honky wif a crib and gitas and a ride and I be livin' large"..

..or however you say it.

I also see where they would get annoyed at the GOPe who NEVER EVEN GOES THERE AND ASKS FOR THEIR VOTE. Nutless, dickless McStain and Mutt Rumbley just hung with their rich posses and soldiered on with out any outreach howsumever. So, as far as them government is concerned, black folks can choose a shithead form column A or a shithead form column B.

Speaking of shitheads, here's his opponent on the subject of this outreach:

During a speech in August in Reno, Nevada, Clinton accused Trump of being disingenuous with his outreach to African-American voters. Clinton also accused Trump of “mainstreaming” white nationalism.

“Donald Trump misses so much,” Clinton said. “He doesn’t see the success of black leaders in every field, the vibrancy of black-owned businesses, the strength of the black church. He doesn’t see the excellence of historically black
colleges and universities or the pride of black parents watching their children thrive.”

Well, there you go, folks! From her hidden bunker and hospital room somewhere in upstate New York or at some Hollywood or Hamptons or Woods' Hole fundraiser, Frau Colostomy Bag chirps out some meaningless blather during her busy schedule of NOT going to Louisiana or NOT going to Mexico City like we give a flying crap. Add to that the fact that she has been part of the problem since she and her husband (the real "First Black President") arrived on the scene in early '91 locking up them soul brothers and doing jack shit for the racial tensions as FLOTUS, Senator form New York, and SOS."

Shut your pie-hole, you insufferable, sclerotic old cunt.

So then, of course (and rightfully or wrongfully), I believe Donald Trump is motivated to do this outreach for the same reason he was motivated to run for President. Basically, he's a 71-year-old man with all the money he needs to care for his family and live out his life in comfort and relative worry. He sure as shit does not need the stress and aggravation he's getting on the campaign trail now from the media and the Democrats and the race pimps and all of the rest of this crowd who have turned the United States of America into a shit pile of weak, mewling assholes and GimmeDats. And, when he wins the election, this will only increase exponentially.

Also, there's a history of race pimps on the subject of Donald Trump that makes their words today pretty embarrassing:

Like I said, expect people to whine when you move in on their territory.

Of all the gin joins in all the towns..

Here is something I stumbled on that just riveted me right down to my socks:

I responded to this dear, sweet lady:

Ma'am, you can wander through the blizzard of rhetoric, comments, and written articles and editorials and not find a comment MORE SALIENT AND PERTINENT AS YOURS.

You have distilled the essence of Mr Trump's popularity: he has articulated our pain and anger and frustration with our elected government and has promised that he will be our voice as our president.

God bless you ma'am and God bless the good people of this United States of America.