May 31, 2016

Quashing internet evil..

I note this morning that our internet social nannies/betters have vowed to nip hate speech in the bud:

Here's another howler from the Euro-Commie thought-crime police:

One assumes this "diligence" will include the vile sewage stream flowing out of the immigrants/liberal nut-lickers calling Trump a Nazi (and worse) as well as the relentless diatribe by the R.O.P. goat humping head-hackers in the desert. Of course, it's just an enabling, worthless, hypocritical, feel-good circle-jerk by the entitled billionaires who seek to control our thought crimes.

Personally, I have no problem with seeing and reading folks' crap about Trump, the mewling that "entitled" ILLEGAL immigrants post, nor the Mooz-lem convert-or-die filth. It only shows how evil, idiotic, and misguided these people are.

..Elate Five-Seven out.

*FM squelch tail*

ADD INTERNET EVIL: Well, here's a little tidbit to show you that Mexican Anti-Trumpers have their feet planted firmly on the ground:

Yessir, folks! So then it's o.k. to teach my youngest child to memorize a diatribe like "murder that lying, fat sow criminal Dem candidate, Hillary Clinton!" Well, based on this, I would say so. But then my youngest child is a 26-year-old U. S. Marine Corps Sargent transitioning to the USAF to do EOD -- and already feels very strongly re Clinton and her ability to serve as his commander-in-chief.

May 29, 2016

Time to differentiate..

Consider this video of a father protecting his son from anti-Trump protesters in San Diego this past week:

(Hat tip to Gateway Pundit.)

And then there's this video of students in Mexico City speaking their mind to a cardboard cut-out of The Donald:

Again, conflating Trump's positions with racism because..why, exactly? Help me out here. I am confused.

Of course, their opinions are valid and some are well-reasoned and sans the vitriol of their ILLEGAL protesting countrymen in El Norte. We understand the problems and drugs in Mexico and would be happy to help were the government of that country AT EVERY LEVEL not so corrupt. As to Donald Trump's so-called racism, he has LEGALLY employed many Americans of Hispanic descent and given them opportunities. Let me repeat: He LEGALLY EMPLOYEES them; he does not steal from the American people and provide ILLEGAL ALIENS with benefits we pay for with our taxes.

Moreover, your people who come to our country as ILLEGAL ALIENS only look at El Norte as a way to get a quick (albeit hard-earned) buck and who send the money back to your impoverished country. I know and respect a great many Hispanics in this country -- illegal and legal -- who do work hard and try to escape the corruption, cartels, and oppressive poverty that is extant in Mexico. I am sympathetic as well. But, until the people of Mexico take steps to eliminate the corruption and elect a government that rightfully and honorably protect their people, your country will be a teeming morass of folks chasing mordidas and drug money payouts. And it will not be a problem that our country and our people are obligated to solve -- unless the cross-border traffic imperils our citizens and our economic interests.

By the way, Trump wants to fix immigration so that more can come into this country, share in its bounty, and make us great. Up here, most of us Trump supporters honor any immigrant from any land so long as they have a commitment to family, loved ones, a decent life -- and to America first.

Would you rather your impoverished countrymen have a better opportunity at legal status where they would be paid a decent wage for their efforts or continue to be "imported" by the Dem/GOPe Uniparty who exploit your expatriate citizens for their votes and ever-cheapening labor?

(Oh, as long as we're on the subject of working in a foreign country, how should I go about seeking employment in Mexico? Should I just head down across the border to Ensenada and fill out an employment app at a local hotel or bar? Or do I have to apply for a work visa or other legally recognized government immigrant work status? And, come to think about it, how's the Mexican/Guatemala immigrant issue working out for you all? Compare an contrast, snowflakes.)

May 28, 2016

Katie Couric gets her perky little tits caught in a wringer..

So this stunning cunt got caught in a cunning stunt (get it?) during her recently released "Under the Gun" anti-gun documentary for editing in nine seconds of silence after a pregnant question was asked. James O'Keefe jumped ugly on this over on a recent Hot Gas post that "reacquainted me with this little act of desperation and it is recommend you visit there for some truly righteous comments regarding this stunning cunt's cunning stunt.

The original was exposed by FNC and roundly commented on by Howard Kurz:

Adding some time to let people chew on the poignancy of the question, my ass!

Frankly, it's shit like this that neuters the anti-gunners' arguments. Who knows what other journalistic shit she may have pulled? Now her entire video is down the terlet.

May 27, 2016

Frotzing Nancy-boy Lawn Jockey POTUS invades Asia..

..well, well, well. Seems our frotzing Nancy-boy Lawn Jockey POTUS is mincing around Asia butt-smooching/hugging/fellating all manner of Orientals and profusely apologizing for all of our transgressions (real or imagined) in that mysterious corner of the world.

You will note the photo above how -- like all of the other shots with him and furrin' dignitaries -- he's turned sideways in the pic while the furriner is facing straight on like he does not give a fetid shit.

Also, to clear the record, as I have mentioned a bajillion times, Ms War Planner is a born-again daughter of the Land of the Rising Yen and, while Hiroshima and Nagasaki loom in their memories over there, they are also beset with uneasy feelings over how Japan comported itself in Korea, China, and the South Pacific in the 30s and during WWII.

That ship has sailed, they are among our staunchest allies, and many wish to move on and not pick at the 50-60 year old scab like this piece of shit does.

Oh, and how do the Japanese regard Obama? Well, in his first few years, they were all dazzled like most of the World was. But after a couple of trips through town mouthing his empty platitudes and promises and then going to South Korea and selling the Japanese out to them, they see him for the empty suit he really is.

Abe cannot tolerate him.

May 26, 2016

May 24, 2016


Predictable outrage via NBC from a Washington Beacon article:
"NBC Calls Trump Attacks on Bill Clinton’s Sex Scandals ‘Another Low’"

NBC News called presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump’s most recent attacks on former president Bill Clinton’s alleged past sexual transgressions “another low” in the 2016 presidential campaign on Tuesday.

NBC correspondent Peter Alexander reported on the most recent spat between Trump and Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton on the Today show when he detailed the real estate mogul’s most recent allegations against the former first couple.

“It’s only May, but this race is hitting another low: Donald Trump’s latest attack on the Clintons, revisiting decades-old allegations of sexual misconduct against Bill Clinton that Fox News host Bill O’Reilly called tawdry,” Alexander said.
..exit question: when one is discussing septic tanks, how does one avoid talking about shit?

May 23, 2016

Coming together at last..

I read somewhere yesterday a comment where someone sarcastically mentioned the pundits saying Trump could not win because he was upside down "with lesbian Eskimos who owned parakeets" or other specious polls. Typical of the GOPe Media Reporting Systems (hereinafter referred to as GOMERS) who simultaneously fail to notice the cracks appearing in Clinton's fortress walls.

Well, there ARE are significant cracks appearing. Someone over at Hot Gas made a comment about all of the hand-wringing pearl-clutcher media types who constantly preach that Trump is doomed and he will be annihilated by Clinton. Well, Newt Gingrich begs to differ.

NEWT GINGRICH: I don’t think these polls signal a close race by November. I think if you look at the trend line, it signals that Trump will probably consolidate support while Hillary Clinton continues to stagnate. And the odds are pretty good Trump will win just like Reagan did in 1980, by a surprisingly big number…

She now has a real “civil war” [on her hands in the Democratic Party]… Bernie Sanders just endorsed the primary opponent of the chair of the Democratic National Committee! Sanders is committed to going all the way to the convention in a really bitter fight. Democrats are really looking like they will be in shambles by November.

Also, there was a nice Brett Baer-hosted piece on Trump Sunday afternoon and it spoke to, among other things, how Trump has 70 people on his staff (to HRC's 730) and has spent 1/3 of the money in destroying the GOPe field of 16 versus what that fat hag has to try to shoo off her grotty commie rival.

There was also THIS GUY who was an absolute prince and -- along with Milo Yiannopoulos -- is giving the LEFTIST rainbow folks fits.

Just for grins, trudge over to You Tube and look at all of the vids by blacks and Hispanics who are backing trump. These are sincere, heartfelt expressions of how these people transcend their divisions and back a person they believe will do the best job at restoring this nation.

I personally thing the Dyke [pun intended] is about to burst!.

..afterthought: I went over to his You Tube video immediately after the show to comment and noticed that there were a few comments from about two-three months ago when he put it up. Went back there today at lunch and saw that the place exploded; just festooned with appreciative and sympathetic comments by Trump supporters -- many of them gay and many of them gay vets.


May 22, 2016

The [late] great George Carlin weighs in on PC talk..

..from beyond the vale, George Carlin weighs in on a major affliction of these latter years.

While he dwells on "liberals" in this diatribe, to be fair, Mr Carlin was an equal opportunity critic of the human condition. He would blast the right and left with equal zeal -- which is more than fine with me because, well, I am certainly not perfect and, hell, even Jesus has had some jokes or criticisms made about him. So, I enjoy chuckling at my faults and hypocrisies.

But I am sure that there are some who are -- ahem -- less tolerant of criticism and "free speech". Case in point, here's 15 minutes of cringe-worthy self-torture for we masochists. Can you imagine dating or marrying one of these irate snowflakes -- let alone existing in a world run by them?

Sure do love the F-bomb, don't they?


May 19, 2016


It's all in how you look at things, I guess:

So where's Julie Andrews when you really need her? Or Clark Griswold for that matter.

I am sick and tired of Google Masthead PC shit, are you?

Are you people as sick and tired of Google hectoring us about PC shit in their masthead? Just so you know the full 9-1-1 on their leftist advocacy (Wiki quote emphasis added):

Yuri Kochiyama (河内山 百合 Kōchiyama Yuri?, May 19, 1921 – June 1, 2014) was a Japanese American human rights activist[1]. She is notable as one of the few prominent non-black Black separatists. Influenced by Marxism, Maoism, and the thoughts of Malcolm X, she was an advocate for many revolutionary movements.

By the way, Ms War Planner (native of The Land of the Rising Sun and pretty smart in the way of current events -- AND TRUMP FANATIC) responded when asked about this oba-san: "who?"

Anybody know of a decent search engine so one does not have to tolerate this bullshit?

May 18, 2016

Defender of Pigs

Once she sheds the 74-year-old socialist gadfly, here's what she's walking into with Trump:

May 17, 2016

A few slices of Paul Joseph Watson..

If you get tired of hearing these self-anointed celeb monitors of the politically correct hectoring you about what to feel and how to act, well this ought to spice things up a bit: the way, Palul Joseph Watson does not reserve his diatribes for all of "our enemies"; he has some rants about Israel heavy-handedly blowing away four Palestinian kids playing soccer on a beach. It's painful to those of us who generally back Israel, but it's stuff that has to be heard and understood if we do not want to come off sounding like that insufferable git Clooney and his crowd.

Stay tuned; there will be more. I'd say he gives it to his targets with both barrels but, in truth, it's more like a full-auto 12 gauge pump action.

And, as long as I am at it, here's The Cohibatator bloviating about illegal immigration. Here's from his 1996 State of the Union Address:

But there are some areas that the federal government should not leave and should address and address strongly. One of these areas is the problem of illegal immigration. After years of neglect, this administration has taken a strong stand to stiffen the protection of our borders. We are increasing border controls by 50 percent. We are increasing inspections to prevent the hiring of illegal immigrants. And tonight, I announce I will sign an executive order to deny federal contracts to businesses that hire illegal immigrants.

Let me be very clear about this: We are still a nation of immigrants; we should be proud of it. We should honor every legal immigrant here, working hard to become a new citizen. But we are also a nation of laws.

Sounds like The Donald, don't he?

May 14, 2016

Circling the bowl..

..and this tour de force:

May 10, 2016

Ripped off from Hot Gas: Gwyneth Paltrow selling $15,000, 24 carat gold dildo

Too good to pass up from Hot Gas comes this little gem:

In the first ever sex issue of the Goop newsletter, perfectly timed for Women’s Health Week, Paltrow makes it her personal mission to find a recipe for a 100% organic lube that “will turn the driest of deserts into your own personal slip ‘n slide.” She was inspired by the fictional character Frankie Bergstein, played by Lily Tomlin on the Netflix comedy Grace and Frankie, who has a running joke about developing yam lube.

Recommend you head over there and get your daily dose of Hot Gas; the obligatory thread of double-entendre is just too delicious to pass up.

Especially this: is good!

May 8, 2016

Trump: Goldwater or Reagan?

Anyone who spends more than five minutes watching one of those hoary panels on Fox News, CNN, or other media circuses, comes away with the impression that Trump has a HUGE mountain to climb, has the highest negatives of any candidate ever, is grossly upside down in many demographics (particularly women) and basically will lose in a landslide to Hillary Clinton.

I am not sure, at this point, what the reality will be in the penultimate month of the year. But I do know this:

(1) These are the very same pundits, commentators, and talking heads who gave Trump zero chance at the nomination when he was up against 17 other organized and funded campaigns -- arguably many with resources that were on par with Clinton's campaign. And yet he bested them all, [still] rolling up the largest total votes cast for a Republican candidate in a primary ever.

(2) There is a decided difference in the trajectory in the campaigns of Clinton v. Trump. One is limping along fighting a rear-guard action and buying all the party insiders it can find while the other is whistle-stopping America and winning a great number of followers by speaking to the common citizens of this country and directly addressing their concerns.

(3) As inferred above, a 74-year-old politician with absolutely no perceptible achievements during his time in the U. S. Senate, has fought her to a standstill. He has done this by promising "Free Shit" to a bunch of unrealistic, idealistic, naive yutes who openly admit that they dislike Clinton because of her links to the establishment. He will undoubtedly not win the nomination because of Clinton's enormous funding and heavy majority of the insider "super delegates", but a victory in this manner by Clinton will not endear a great many of these folks to her. Yet the math by the pundits beggars the imagination, insinuating that all of them will flop over to Clinton if Sanders does not get the nod. (This is as nuts as the pundits' adding up the votes for the other candidates in a primary and assuming that none would go to Trump if their candidate dropped out.)

(4) Clinton is a notoriously dismal campaigner, she is not likable and tends to shed votes as she goes along -- as she did v. Obama in 2008. There's also the nagging question of her accomplishments. What in hell has she actually done as a senator or S. O. S.?

(5) she is under a cloud -- a veritable thunderhead -- of suspicion because of (a) her e-mail frolics, (b) her absolute treasonous and incompetent handling of the Benghazi affair, (c) any implications of impropriety surrounding the Clinton fund, (d) the big biz and "insider" donors, etc.

(6) In the past, Republicans have been backing candidates who are basically eunuchs. The neutered ex-pow Senator from Arizona who should be walking around some rest home in Arizona in a ratty bathrobe and slippers with his winky hanging out and Mitt Romney who should just plain shut the fuck up. Both had their chances to put one of the most incompetent, inexperienced POTUS candidates in his place but suffered from "trigger fright". McCain mumbled something about Obama being basically a good man during his attempt in 2008 and we all know how Mittens whiffed when the cookie-crunching Crowley openly took Obama's side in the second debate. By contrast, not a week after Trump became the presumptive nominee, he came out with guns blazing and swatted down Clinton's first two tenuous ads. For good measure, he similarly batted away that Elizabeth Warren's feeble attempts to describe him as a hate monger and a bigot. I do not foresee Trump altering this approach. As the old Texas football coach, Darrel Royal, used to say about his not changing his offensive strategy before a big game, "You gotta dance with who brung ya."

(7) These pundits are as willfully clueless to what the American people are angry about (and why) as are the feckless Republican legislators we have sent to congress over the past 8 years. They both are inside that impenetrable beltway bubble with their six-figure incomes, emoluments, aggrandizement, and their kids tucked away in Sidwell Friends. They are totally oblivious to what we mirror-fogging, mouth-breathing proles are upset about. The last time the ruling class was this far out of touch with the peasants, it didn't end very well at all.

So, basically, I believe that the asshat pundits and commentators on those shows need to buy a vowel (or two). But Will Trump get elected? Is he a shoo-in?

I dunno.

But I do know that I have been through two elections like this in my lifetime that frame the yin and yang of what will happen in November.

That is, will Donald Trump be a Goldwater or will he be a Reagan?

And by this, I do NOT refer to the politics of those three gentlemen. (And, goodness knows, the label 'conservative' has been diluted and misappropriated over the last three campaigns) I refer, instead, to whether Trump will be a principled individual speaking to a principled but minority contingent of the electorate as Goldwater did and get buried in a landslide of Dem lies and hate. Or, will Trump be able to tap into a wellspring of anger and frustration abroad in this land and unseat an incompetent government in response to the will of the people as Reagan did.

Truth be told, I do not know. But I suspect we will find out right soon.